TN Supreme Court Reinstates Aggravated Stalking Conviction

Friday, June 16, 2017
The Supreme Court has reinstated an aggravated stalking conviction of a defendant for knowingly violating an order of protection.  The Court reversed a Court of Criminal Appeals decision that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to have convicted the defendant on the aggravated stalking charge. 
 
This case arose from an incident in which the defendant physically and verbally accosted a woman to whom he had been married and with whom he had two children.  He confronted her in a parking lot while she was waiting to pick up a pizza and then followed her to a gas station.
 Police arrived at the gas station and arrested the defendant.  The next day, the victim obtained an order of protection against the defendant, and she was informed that the defendant had been served with the order of protection. That same day, the victim had an encounter with the defendant when the defendant and his mother drove past her, turned around, and then followed her.  The victim called the police, and the defendant was arrested again.  Over the next month, the defendant and victim had two other encounters.  At one, the defendant arrived at a Verizon store and banged on the window while the victim paid her phone bill inside.  At the other, the defendant drove past the victim’s house, shouting profanities and telling the victim’s daughter that he was “gonna get her.”  
 
The defendant was indicted on charges of domestic assault and aggravated stalking.  Following a jury trial, the defendant was acquitted of domestic assault but convicted of aggravated stalking.  The defendant appealed, arguing that the proof at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for aggravated stalking, and the Court of Criminal Appeals agreed, reducing the defendant’s conviction from aggravated stalking to misdemeanor stalking.
 
The Supreme Court granted the State’s application for permission to appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision reversing the trial court’s judgment.  The Court considered whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in reducing the defendant’s conviction to misdemeanor stalking based on insufficiency of the trial evidence.
 
In the unanimous opinion, authored by Chief Justice Jeff Bivins, the Court determined that the Court of Criminal Appeals improperly reweighed the evidence presented at trial, rather than assessing the sufficiency of that evidence, as is required under the appellate standard of review.  In considering the sufficiency of the evidence, the Supreme Court determined that sufficient proof was adduced at trial for a jury to determine that the defendant had actual notice of the order of protection.  Therefore, he knowingly violated an order of protection.  Accordingly, the Court reversed the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment and reinstated the defendant’s aggravated stalking conviction.  
 
To read the Supreme Court’s opinion in State of Tennessee v. Rodney Stephens, authored by Chief Justice Jeff Bivins, go to the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.


CRMA Manufacturers To Hold Excellence Awards Luncheon

The Chattanooga Regional Manufacturers Association will host its annual Manufacturers Excellence Awards Luncheon on Wednesday this week at the Chattanooga Convention Center, Exhibit Hall C.  The luncheon will begin at 11:30 a.m. and end at 1 p.m. The event serves to recognize members of the organization who exemplify practices resulting in manufacturing excellence. The ... (click for more)

Nominations Open For 2018 International Business Awards

The International Business Council (IBC) of the Chattanooga Chamber of Commerce announces the second annual IBC International Business Awards. These awards showcase the positive contributions international businesses make to the greater Chattanooga region. Any Chattanooga area businesses engaged in international trade (either products or services, importing or exporting) are ... (click for more)

Jury Clears Juvenile Judge Philyaw Of Discrimination Charge In Dismissal Of Openly Gay Magistrate

A federal jury deliberated about an hour on Tuesday afternoon before ruling in favor of Juvenile Court Judge Rob Philyaw, who had been sued by an openly gay magistrate that he dismissed. Judge Travis McDonough had dismissed the other two defendants - Court Administrator Sam Mairs and Hamilton County - from the case at the close of the proof. Judge Philyaw said, "I thank the ... (click for more)

Attorney Elliott Says City Council Action On Mountain Creek Zoning Case "Highly Irregular And Highly Illegal"

The City Council on Tuesday night took action on a Mountain Creek zoning case, though attorney Sam Elliott said it was "highly irregular and highly illegal." The council voted 7-2 to instruct the city attorney to file a new zoning case on a section of the former Quarry golf course against the wishes of the owner of the property and the developer who plans to buy it. Attorney ... (click for more)

Why Can't Someone Unstop The Water Buildup Problem At The I-24 Cummings Highway Exit? - And Response

Exit 174 on westbound Interstate 24 is closed again as is the westbound entrance ramp. Cummings Highway is shut as well. I inquired at TDOT on Dec. 28, 2015, why this continues to happen. The engineer’s response was that the drain from ground west of the interstate runs under private land and cover over it has caused that pipe to collapse. Obviously flow still goes through, ... (click for more)

Roy Exum: ‘We’ll Lose The Senate!’

A guy who I admire and respect wrote me yesterday. He had just read my story defending Bob Corker for honoring “The Code” due to his true friendship with Phil Bredesen. He is also no stranger to my vivid dislike of the Republican choice to replace Corker in the Senate. Marsha Blackburn is no match against Bredesen on any tier and it is clearly the Republican Party itself that has ... (click for more)